Today is designated as my sacred writing day cuz I meet with Marie tomorrow & I’m not sure how I feel about where my thesis is at. Okay, I guess. It is where it is, where it only can be right now.
A theme that keeps popping up lately has been the role of the subjectivity of the artist– the artist’s I. My I. Do I attempt to make myself consistent? Am I building a whole? Let me preface this exploration by saying I feel it is irresponsible not to question who the I of yr poems may be. Does it blaze through, as a false whole? How does the organizing principle (the I) of yr poems deal with past selves.
So many poets I love posit this I, this self-making, as phantasmagoric– ghost, fortunately or unfortunately, embodied. I’ve grown to prefer looking at the I as an art project, a construction, a Christmas tree. The only issue I see with this is who is in charge of the building? Who or what has the agency to create? This is where I like my understanding of Spinoza– all complicated intersections, collisions in time….
I feel like I do this well in poems about the dead. My dead Daddy poems. This may work, ironically, because he is ghost, ghost that I give form in my poems…
am I doing as much for myself? How can I show the seems of this without deadening emotional response? This is important to me…I’d like my poems to be a contemplative space, but what I’m practiced at is creating feeling. This requires, so often, working within the familiar tools of language. It’s like writing a symphony (duh)… creating expectations with language, subverting them while not breaking outside of the language. Disruption (whether by drawing attention to pronoun trouble, or the problem of the typical personal mythology of the first book) can often draw the reader (by which I mean me as a reader) out of the emotional space into a thinking space. It’s somewhat Brechtian– allowing the audience to have an intellectual reaction, to incite change…
But what do I want from my poetry? Is my aim, ultimately, to have my reader question her/his/hir I, their subjectivities? While that may be an undercurrent of a lot of the non-lyrical poetry writing I do, I’m not sure if my poetry has broken into this. It really is a lot more about imagination– the I may be ghost, construction, coincidence, but because of this, because we are not bound, we are free to imagine ourselves, imagine difference, different lives, different ways of relating to one another, of communing with the dead, of questioning the boundaries of ourselves& how we conceive of ourselves, of seeing who effects this.
I have this conversation with myself about my work, but does this need to enter the poems? & how? It would be a risk. A huge one. Part of me wants to say it will appear when I’m ready for it to, that I need to trust the visitation cuz that’s how I do the writing that is most helpful for me, that challenges me to question how I’m representing myself to myself & relating to others.
Challenge vs. Happiness is a mighty false dichotomy, I’d like to think…
***
holy shit I want an egg sandwich with sausage. probably fake.
***
Is it irresponsible not to write myself as a ghost when I feel more like a projector?