if I land in Salt Lake City & the mountains make me cry
& I’m not sure whether this is because I feel overjoyed to see them or because I feel oppressed by them, by what parts of my life here stood for…
…if I publish this, am I dealing with these feelings? It feels like releasing them. By putting them out into the world to an anonymous audience, it makes the ambiguity feel okay. To this writer.
…if I never tell anyone, did it really happen, or are the mountains just weighing heavier on my heart? The guise of control over this weight. Guise of control over the situations in which (I) someone may feel vulnerable, be forced to question..
& I want to encourage people to question because I think disassembly, the way I disassemble my life is the universal way to happiness?
I think I have to believe it is a way to happier
richer, that it can be a way to art, which can be a way to something mystical
which can be a container for lack-of-control, a way in & out of control, perhaps…
Again, I question why I do this. Why I blog. What do I mean by transparency? Why choose it? Out of laziness? As a way of breaking down closetedness? If I admit something, am I assuming there is already a closet there…
I avoided using the word closeted at dinner last night to avoid having to speak as a queer person. Though I clearly was, speaking as one. Did my knowledge speak for myself? The experiences which I shared, did they carry weight without categorization?
Devin said I was a hit at dinner, that what I contributed to the conversation made people think, question.
This is not a stable position. Again, I have diverted– questioning why I do this again. Is there a theoretical standpoint or is it just an impulse, an itch that needs to be scratched…
a way of being safe that is not quite….
Article in the newest issue of Bitch about the “new narrator” in fiction. Blog-inflected. The new narrator shares her transgressions– things that she does in an attempt to be loved, or to have experiences. Nothing is hidden– not necessarily tattooed across her forehead, but available. Rather than being shamed, the new narrator, is, well, unchanged– she continues to be what the article called overexposed.
The narrative for women is no longer adventure/impulse, then embarrassment/shaming, then assimilation/”happiness.” New narrators are no longer married off. Or, divorcing from unhappiness to adventure to finding strength in oneself which is often rewarded by money &/or the love of a new partner…
Does the new narrator/narrative give the character/reader who may identify with character the power to engage beyond received narratives, to be within what is really the slow, sometimes joyful, sometimes painful, often cyclical (non-linear) process of self-awareness?
What do I mean by transparency? Open to what society deems oversharing. I still choose the same way someone who shares nothing chooses.
…if I put all this out there, does it become useable? Any future employer could make a caricature of me from what I put on the web & that doesn’t discourage me…
I welcome being a caricature.
I’d rather be honest with my feelings than nice in the long run (but that of course means that I have to continue this slow process of getting over always feeling like I’m imposing on space as an invasion, that to think my thoughts & experiences are valuable to share in casual conversation is somehow evidence of being uncaring or self-absorbed (but who isn’t) or not aware of dynamics between people, the delicate balance it takes to make something new, new questions, new experiences of others…
if the goal is always growth, I feel so good about Thanksgiving dinner. Not only because Devin’s mom & family & friends may have encountered new questions (how arrogant of me to assume!) but because I am laying here at 8:29 am & thinking again about what it is I get out of this…
I have new questions.
more & more I realize my paradoxical relationship to safety
what is it that I want to avoid? If someone veils me with the term arrogance, does it make me completely inaccessible? Or only if I identify with it & act with the entire history of the word…
why look at this only in terms of gain / loss? What is gained when we perceive gain? Whose rules am I following, whose happy life am I emulating? Or is this my space for building, for attempting to shatter the narrative of the happy life in which this blog will either take me to the illusion of end point or not…
I do this, this process, this ever-mutating definition of transparency because I enjoy it, because often it FEELS better than not seeing my thoughts/feelings/inklings fleshed out before me in comprehensible signs, the containers of language. The reason is more of a poem than a thesis or a standpoint. It may have something to do with control, but I’m not sure how. I’m not going to tell someone else this is the way to happiness, because happiness for another individual may be safety or something else, a whole list that I have not imagined or have & cannot or will not flesh out here.
However, even when I am confused or anxious, I love my life, the adventure of it.
However, nothing exists in a vacuum. If this blog contributes to shattering the received life “narratives,” if it prevents me from choosing something so I can be happy without examining it or thinking about what I want or what the environment I want demands, doesn’t it create that possibility for others? Can’t my poems do that, too? Is that what people have meant? Is that what it is, to be moved by art? In part, I think so.
& sometimes, I can be embarrassed by how I used to keep myself at a distance from art or life, be ashamed of tears as a sign of weakness (femininity! I was (am sometimes) so ashamed of being feminine because it meant that I was a target, someone easy to keep down so others could feel powerful…)
To feel it now. To come to a place of finding strength in vulnerability.
This, in part, what I want Adrienne Rich to have meant by freedom. In this space, I feel free to build my own life. To take risks, to put my heart on the line, to allow experience or growth or feeling to define me rather than keeping things. Than keeping the image of something always being the same & therefore always exciting (because it won’t be. The moment has passed, it was excellent to have felt it, now find something else to give you another glimpse of joy…)
Keep something, hide your heart. Keep happiness (or joy or whatever its more dynamic cousin…), consult it, co-create with it…
perhaps. I’ll work for this for now, I may change, strip these thoughts from the internet where readers don’t know me entirely– but all we can ever get of someone is a glimpse. We are those glimpses. The I as an affect of the moment.
… & you do not know how passionately I talk with my hands.